WebFeb 20, 2024 · the only gate that needs precise calibration. Here we implement the X ˇ 2 gate by a microwave pulse with a cosine-shaped envelope (t) = 0 (1 1cos(2ˇt=t g)) with the gate length t g = 20 ns. To suppress leakage and phase errors, we introduce the derivative reduction by adiabatic gate (DRAG) scheme [23{25] for the pulse en-velope, i.e. … WebJan 18, 2011 · Our result contains and improves the previously developed derivative removal by adiabatic gate technique [F. Motzoi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009)] and allows a generalization to other nonlinear oscillators with more than one leakage …
Simple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits
WebMicrowave pulses with Gaussian envelopes and in/quadrature-phase (I/Q) modulation adopting the Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) approach [19] are used to mini- mize leakage to higher energy states of the resonator. WebJul 30, 2024 · Ii Derivative Removal by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) To go beyond these simple pulses we introduce an adiabatic transformation V that allows us to work entirely in the qubit subspace. This transformation is V (t) = exp[−iEx(^σy 0,1 + λ^σy 1,2)/2Δ], (7) where Ex/Δ is the adiabaticity parameter. fitting baño
[PDF] Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in …
WebJan 27, 2024 · One can also use the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) approach 50, 51 in a single qubit gate, but this procedure is not suitable for general three-level systems. In this article,... WebJun 20, 2016 · A method for the unsupervised control of quantum gates in near-term quantum computers is defined and it is proved that the non-stable quantum gate becomes controllable via a machine learning method if the quantum gates formulate an entangled gate structure. PDF Unsupervised Quantum Gate Control for Gate-Model Quantum … WebSep 17, 2015 · Indeed, the suppression of phase errors using Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) pulse shaping [8] has helped push single qubit fidelity in super¬ conducting qubits over 99.9%, nominally satisfying one of the requirements for realizing quantum error correction (QEC) [9, 10]. can i get a checking account at 17