Webin his paper on "Diffusionism and Archaeology". To use Rowe's words, doctri-naire diffusionism is a hardy weed which has now crossed the fence of ethno-logical pastures and begins to infest archaeology. He adds: "We are now being subjected in archaeological meetings to ever more strident claims that Meso- Webcentric diffusionism (pp. 1-43). Chapter 2, "The Myth of the Euro-pean Miracle," examines the key claims used to substantiate the supremacy and uniqueness of Europe (biology-race, demography, environment, rationality, technology, society, state, Church, class, and family) over other people and places in the world (pp. 50-135).
Diffusionism Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
WebDec 8, 2016 · Hyper-diffusion in Archaeology. The Newark Holy Stones, a faked set of artifacts with a diffusionist mission. Photo courtesy Ohio State University. This is a term that gets tossed around among archaeologists and academics, particularly when they’re being critical of the many nonsense claims of sensationalists like Brien Foerster, Frank Joseph ... WebDiffusionism (1880-1900) Some anthropologists believed they could account for cultural similarities through this process. It is the exchange of ideas and influences from one … sibel hotel antalya
Diffusionism : Introduction, origin, types - Unacademy
Webof classical diffusionism tended to accept its main proposition that Europe is the world's source of culturally significant innovations. Classical diffusionism was strongly though not thoroughly criticized. Its most salient form, the "'extreme diffusionism" that attributed almost all cultural origins to diffusion and claimed to find a WebDiffusionism. Focusing on the notion that similarities among cultures resulted from components spreading from one culture to another, diffusionism is often seen as a reaction to the paradigm of classic unilinear evolutionism, which traced cultural development to the ability of cultures to innovate independently. WebJan 20, 2024 · Doctrinaire diffusionism is a menace to the development of sound archaeological theory based on comparative studies; it distracts archaeologists from such studies and seeks to destroy the basis of comparison. Diffusionist arguments are defective in principle, however. The bias in the selection of data for these arguments can be … the people\u0027s bank eaten georgia