Dukhmochan pandey v state of bihar
WebSep 25, 1997 · Witnesses have established that Dukhmochan Pandey was holding a gun, Uttam Pandey was holding a Lathi, Kameshwar Pandey was holding a Bhala, Jibacch … WebDec 22, 2024 · In the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at the same time….the distinction between a common intention and similar intention may be fine, but is nonetheless a real one and if ...
Dukhmochan pandey v state of bihar
Did you know?
WebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar (1997) 8 SCC 405 , 1998 SCC (Cri) 93 this Court has held that there lies a distinction between the common intention and similar intention and the question whether there exists a common intention in all the persons who did some overt act resulting in the death of some of the persons of the other ... WebCommon Intention and Similar Intention Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar , the complainant had sent about 20 labours to his field for transplanting paddy. On the mid day the accused party came as a mob of about 200 people armed with various deadly weapons.
WebAt 12 noon a mob of about 200 persons armed with Gun, Bhala, Gadasa, Bow-arrow and Lathi reached the filed of whom he could see Dukhmochan Pandey and Sarbnarain holding guns in their hands; Soukhilal Yadav, Amirilal Yadav, Sukhram Mishra, Jainandan, Ram Chander Pandey, Ram Chandra Sharma, Tapeshwar, Kameshwar Pandey and …
WebAt this stage, reference may be made to the decision of Apex Court in the case of Dukhmochan Pandey and Ors. v. State of Bihar, reported in AIR 1998 SC, 40 and … WebPETITIONER: STATE OF BIHAR Vs. RESPONDENT: MATHU PANDEY & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/04/1969 BENCH: BACHAWAT, R.S. BENCH: BACHAWAT, R.S. SIKRI, …
WebIn the case Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad, Supreme court emphasized on this point that prior concert need not be something always very much prior to the incident, but could well be ... In the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: "Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different ...
WebThe short facts of the case are that Jayantibhai Shanabhai Chauhan, PW6 filed complaint (Exh.47) with Kapadwanj Rural Police Station stating that on 10.12.2008 when he was with his father Shanabhai Sukhabhai (deceased) and his brother Prabhatbhai Shanabhai and his younger brother Rabhabhai Shanabhai with Daulatbhai Budhabhai, Savitaben … newenglandcfc.givecfc.orgWebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the complainant had sent about 20 labors to his field for transplanting paddy. On midday, the accused party came as a mob of about 200 people armed with various deadly weapons. … inter pf acessoWebCASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 654-655 of 2000 PETITIONER: SUDAMA PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF BIHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/2001 BENCH: … interpet white spot instructionsWebWrit Petition No.19506/2012 11.1.2013 Shri M. S. Bhatti, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S. M. Lal, Government Advocate, for the State/ respondents. The petitioner, while holding the office of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khajra, Janpad Panchayat and Tahsil, Baihar, District Balaghat, has suffered a resolution of no confidence motion. new england chapter 8 nawccWebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at the same time….the distinction between a common intention and similar intention may be fine, but is nonetheless a real one and if ... interp function in matlabWebConsidering the aforesaid facts it was held that the appellants did not share any common object to commit murder of any one. Even in the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State … interp functionWebIn case of Dukhmochanpandey V. State of Bihar[5], where 20 labors were working in a field and 200 people reached to stop them. During the course murder and grievous hurt has been caused. The court held two people liable for murder and ten for causing grievous hurt. Further, the court said that the common intention must be distinguished from ... new england certified development corporation